As I sit in this article reading this account on animals and how vegans seem to feel that it is horribly wrong to take meat and animal products, I am realizing that the further I actually read the more irritated I actually become, and not because We eat various meats and the copy writer doesn't, but for how the copy writer displays not any sign of respect or any type of logical cause as to why we all as various meats eaters are not but a self-righteous number, as the writer put it. I avoid really realise why the article writer thought it was important to refer to individuals that eat meat in such a way that this depicts popular America therefore negatively. Why is vegans a lot better than all others? And why did they get this issue to the level of country wide labeling everyone but themselves. Well, if we are self-righteous then what would specify veganism? Independent panicky woods huggers might be? I think the fact that vegans are definitely the self-righteous group mainly because they portray themselves as being too good to consume meat or perhaps the consumption of meat is somehow beneath them. What gives all of them the right to label us being a conceited culture? When subsequently they are just as independent as they claim we are. From the very beginning with this story We've had a good opinion on how this subject is so worthless and slow almost towards the brink of insanity. Although the writer truly does display a good level of sincerity and determination to this debate, but even with that being said my own opinions from the writer and how his landscapes are sort of one on the sides still stay. A good example of how a writer shows the level of absurdity within the vegetarian belief with the beginning, when the writers were talking about the story of the mouse and how the mouse shared the capacity intended for love, honor and the potential...